Guest Blog: George Lasher

This week instead of my babbling, I’m going to post up a guest blog from the author “George Lasher”. His story, “The Forgetful Wizard” has appeared in two of our published anthologies: “Under the Stairs” and “Damn Faeries”. Thank you for writing in, George!

I started writing in 2000 by penning a fan-fiction, Batman novel. Having proved to myself that I could write and that I enjoyed writing, I wrote a second novel, Telemurdering.

This time the story revolved around characters of my own invention. The euphoria of completing that novel gave away to the pain of rejection from the world of literary agents. The most frustrating thing about the rejections is that they never explained why.  Eager to improve, I joined the Houston Writers Guild and began to learn why my stories weren’t getting accepted: the two big reasons were the words, “was” and “had.”

I didn’t know and I think many novice writers are unaware that the word, “was” is viewed as a weak verb of being. “Was” prevents, rather than provides, description which might further pull readers into my stories. Here’s an example that clicked with me:

Bob said he was sick.
Bob said he felt like he might throw up.

Big difference! I try not to use the word “was,” unless no alternative exists. Now let’s take a look a the word, “had.”

“Had” removes the reader from being “in the moment” with the character. Readers like to be in the moment, rather than always reading about actions that already occurred.

Bob had been thinking about going home for the holidays.
Bob considered going home for the holidays.

I now understand that Literary agents aren’t in the business to teach us how to write. They post loads of helpful information on their websites, but rather than teaching, their job is to represent those who already know how to write. Personally, I’m still learning, but I have seen a number of my short stories published over the past two years. I feel confident that I will become a  published novelist in the near future. I wish that learning to eliminate “had” and “was” could get us all published, but the path to publication is filled with additional potholes, twists, and turns.

Writing is so much like competing in any sport; the required  level of dedication is immense. The world doesn’t care about the many disadvantages we face and if we can’t overcome them through practice and perseverance, we won’t be successful. But if we love to write and are willing to put in the time and effort, we may become the author of a bestseller.

Kindest regards,

George R. Lasher


3 thoughts on “Guest Blog: George Lasher

  1. That’s some good advise, right there. Avoiding weak verbs sticks you on the path to become a published author more firmly. It’s a lesson many should learn and most definitely a valuable one.

  2. From what I’ve been doing, there are other, similar “dead words” that should be handled with care. Usually along the same vein of monosyllabic inactive verbs.

  3. Thanks George, I had a wonderful time and was glad I read the post.

    Although I agree with your assessment, I think we must be careful in painting too broad a brush. For instance, if within the story there is a flashback sequence, writing in past tense is most generally acceptable.

    It’s the same with the old adage—show, don’t tell. Ninety percent of the time, it’s good advice. However, there are always exceptions, like the writer who writes a Ulysses volume book, taking a few short-cuts is probably a good idea and appreciated by the reader.

    And of course, the usage of “I” in a first person narrative is problematic. But to eliminate the pronoun entirely, is even more problematic.

    But your point is well taken.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s